The design of the Main Steam Pressure Reducing Stations in buildings that are being supplied steam from a central steam generating plant or other high pressure steam generating source, must take into consideration load characteristics, rangeability, noise, safety, reliability, long-term maintenance costs and overall control performance.

 

System Load Consideration 

Safety

Noise

Reliability

Features of the system

Conclusions

 

Downloads (pdf)

Brochure

5800 Control Valve

Product Spec 

8624 Indicating Controller

Product Spec  |  IOM

8351 Non-Indicating Controller

Product Spec  |  IOM

 

System Load Considerations

Large buildings utilizing steam usually have complex multi-use, multi-function application requirements. Applications including seasonal heating, air conditioning, domestic hot water, laundry and the like, as well as variations like time of day and outdoor temperature all play a critical role in load requirements. The difference between the maximum capacity, when the building is fully occupied during the day and at night when only minimally utilized, could be a factor of 100 to 1 or more! Because the allowed for application loads often are variable or completely non-existent at night. The entire load on the steam supply at night might only be what is created by condensation and trap losses in the piping system. (Typical pilot operated PRV’s only have a rangeability of 10:1).   Back


Safety

The final stage of a typical pressure reducing station is responsible for reliably supplying low pressure steam to the building header for its various users. Safety relief valves can be deployed but can be cost prohibitive in larger buildings due to logistics and length of the vent pipe, not to mention code constraints and testing requirements. Per the ASME B31.1 Code, either safety relief valves are required on the final low pressure stage OR if two stages of reduction are used and both stages can be automatically set to the safe working pressure of the equipment being served if the one of the stages fail. For several reasons Warren Controls recommends this latter solution and offers the Non-Indicating Safety Pilot to first allow the primary stage to begin regulating to low pressure should the secondary stage ever fail to do its job.  Conversely, the secondary stage has the actuator sized such that it can handle the full drop in the event of primary stage failure. Redundancy is assured. Best practices of protection in managing failure of this final stage include the addition of an automated safety shut-off valve with manual reset.   A separate pressure switch or safety alarm should be configured to trip the automated safety shut-off valve. Many building codes require an automated safety shut-off valve with manual reset in systems that use manual valves to bypass a PRV (for maintenance or manual recovery).  Back


Noise

With steam there can be several aerodynamic noise producing mechanisms including turbulent mixing noise, shock waves, impingement, and shock turbulence interaction. Noise that exceeds specifications can either be controlled at the source or along the transmission path. Large pressure drops across a single controlling device can aggravate noise situations. Another benefit of dual stage reduction is that it is inherently less noisy, splitting the pressure drop across two devices. The noise level at the control valves will automatically be calculated when using ValveWorks® to size the valves and select the valves. Additional noise abatement and suppression techniques and equipment can be deployed when control valves exceed noise requirements so that overall system noise requirements can be met.   Back


Reliability

A typical building with multiple users means that with an outage comes outrage. All energies are immediately put back into getting the system back online. With this premise in mind, the most practical design approach is to reasonably assure that a system failure does not occur in the first place and when one does, reasonable recovery from failure is possible. Designing in redundancy and recovery elements within the system as described above is one aspect. Another is a choosing known reliable components. When it comes to controls, pneumatic controls when properly designed still represent the most reliable types of controls in these high temperature environments. Typical electronic controls reach their limit before high incidence of failure at 122°F.  Many steam equipment rooms in the summer time are already at this temperature near where the controls equipment would typically be located.  Back


Features of the system

 1. Control Valves  that have been sized and selected for optimum performance by using the Warren ValveWorks sizing program with Manual Override handwheel on the Control valves that eliminate the need for a by-pass line. 

2. Parallel Flow Loops on the system in conjunction with inherently higher rangeability globe style control valves with equal percent flow characteristic trim can ensure system rangeability of greater than 100:1.

3. Two-Stage Reduction allows for a method of redundancy as well as inherently minimizing overall system noise by splitting the pressure drop across two devices.

4. Automated shut-off valve with manual reset used in place of a relief valve and vent piping saves tremendous cost.

5. Noise attenuation thru the use of static restrictors (mufflers) after the control valves (when necessary) are far more effective than special aerodynamic quiet trim designs and over the life of the system, more reliable as quiet trim design are prone to both clog with scale and erode faster.

 6. Safety Limiting Pilots (Warren 8351) that take control of the system should anything happen to cause the system pressure to exceed the setting of the low pressure indicating controller (Warren 8624).

7. Indicating Pneumatic Controllers (Warren 8624) with Gain and Integral Reset for accurate and dependable control. These units are capable of operating in environments that that would prohibit the use of electronic controls.

8. Load Transfer Control. Simple electric control that transfers the load from the Low-Flow loop to the High-Flow loop as system demand changes.

9. Alarm Panel

10. Steam Traps

11. Isolation Valves    Back


Conclusions

Successful Steam Reduction Station design requires several aspects for consideration. Start with the system codes you must follow and a complete load analysis of the facility. Quality of the steam and variations is supply pressure must also be considered. Proper piping design and sizing is then paramount. Once all factors are considered, Warren Controls believes we can provide you with the highest performing and most reliable system available. Contact your local Warren Controls representative for further professional assistance.   Back